This Week’s 340B Litigation Update Focused on Contract Pharamacy


Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy

  • Drug manufacturers filed two separate suits to challenge a Washington state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
  • In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff appealed the court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss.
  • In a second case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss, denied the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary Injunction as moot, and dismissed the case for failure to state a claim, and the plaintiff filed an appeal.
  • In four cases brought by drug manufacturers challenging a Utah law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiffs filed responses to the court’s order to show cause.x



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *